On Sun, 2 Sep 2007, rae l wrote: > On 9/2/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > denis: > > > > if you're planning on doing this ARRAY_SIZE cleanup fairly > > rigorously, here's an overview of what you're looking (based on a > > fairly dumb scanning script that undoubtedly generates some false > > positives). of course, the respective subsystem maintainers are > > welcome to deal with them first, of course. > > > > p.s. and when you submit those patches, it's necessary to submit > > them to only the appropriate subsystem mailing lists, not to the > > LKML in general. > I didn't realize that there's so many places to switch to > ARRAY_SIZE, so now I wonder is this cleaning work valuable to the > whole kernel tree? or we can keep the current state and just > encourage new code to use ARRAY_SIZE? that is *so* not my call. i just thought that, if you were about to embark on this clean-up, you knew what was ahead of you. if you're still interested in doing it, my best advice is to do it a subsystem at a time, and submit the patches just to those subsystems or the appropriate maintainers, rather than to the whole LKML, in order to keep the traffic down. and i'd encourage you to keep working on this. and if you have any more general questions, you're better off asking on the kernel janitors list, not LKML. http://kerneljanitors.org/ rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
