On 6/27/2019 3:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:09:26PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
+
+static int process_block_per_sym(struct hist_entry *he)
+{
+ struct annotation *notes;
+ struct cyc_hist *ch;
+ struct block_hist *bh;
+
+ if (!he->ms.map || !he->ms.sym)
+ return 0;
+
+ notes = symbol__annotation(he->ms.sym);
+ if (!notes || !notes->src || !notes->src->cycles_hist)
+ return 0;
+
+ bh = container_of(he, struct block_hist, he);
+ init_block_hist(bh);
+
+ ch = notes->src->cycles_hist;
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < symbol__size(he->ms.sym); i++) {
+ if (ch[i].num_aggr) {
+ struct block_info *bi;
+ struct hist_entry *he_block;
+
+ bi = block_info__new();
+ if (!bi)
+ return -1;
+
+ init_block_info(bi, he->ms.sym, &ch[i], i);
+ he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
+ NULL, &dummy_al, bi);
nit, it's the only caller of hists__add_entry_block, so we don't need
the 'ops' argument in there
other than this, this all looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
thanks,
jirka
Hi Jiri,
Thanks so much!
Do you need me to send v6 which only removes the 'ops' argument from
hists__add_entry_block? Or this v5 should be OK either?
Thanks
Jin Yao