On 6/27/2019 3:27 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:09:26PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

+
+static int process_block_per_sym(struct hist_entry *he)
+{
+       struct annotation *notes;
+       struct cyc_hist *ch;
+       struct block_hist *bh;
+
+       if (!he->ms.map || !he->ms.sym)
+               return 0;
+
+       notes = symbol__annotation(he->ms.sym);
+       if (!notes || !notes->src || !notes->src->cycles_hist)
+               return 0;
+
+       bh = container_of(he, struct block_hist, he);
+       init_block_hist(bh);
+
+       ch = notes->src->cycles_hist;
+       for (unsigned int i = 0; i < symbol__size(he->ms.sym); i++) {
+               if (ch[i].num_aggr) {
+                       struct block_info *bi;
+                       struct hist_entry *he_block;
+
+                       bi = block_info__new();
+                       if (!bi)
+                               return -1;
+
+                       init_block_info(bi, he->ms.sym, &ch[i], i);
+                       he_block = hists__add_entry_block(&bh->block_hists,
+                                                         NULL, &dummy_al, bi);

nit, it's the only caller of hists__add_entry_block, so we don't need
the 'ops' argument in there

other than this, this all looks good to me

Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka


Hi Jiri,

Thanks so much!

Do you need me to send v6 which only removes the 'ops' argument from hists__add_entry_block? Or this v5 should be OK either?


Thanks
Jin Yao

Reply via email to