On 27/06/2019 15:30, Jiangfeng Xiao wrote:
>
>
> On 2019/6/27 22:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 27/06/2019 15:11, Jiangfeng Xiao wrote:
>>> Not every arch has ARM_GIC, it is strange
>>> to see ARM_GIC_MAX_NR in the .config file
>>> of the x86 and IA-64 architecture. so fix
>>> build by adding necessary dependency.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiangfeng Xiao <xiaojiangf...@huawei.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>>> index 659c5e0..e338b471 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
>>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ config ARM_GIC_PM
>>>
>>> config ARM_GIC_MAX_NR
>>> int
>>> + depends on ARM_GIC
>>> default 2 if ARCH_REALVIEW
>>> default 1
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Isn't that the patch[1] that has already been in -next for the past 10
>> days or so?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> M.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/commit/?h=irq/irqchip-next&id=702655234dd1d07e76f9bff9575e438c969fc32c
>>
>
> I am very sorry. I thought that this patch was not reviewed,
> so I pushed it again. I asked my colleagues how to get information
> about whether the patch is included.
>
> Will not make this low-level mistake again.
No worries. I should have replied to the initial patch to indicate that
I had queued it, but it appear I didn't! No harm done anyway.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
