On 11-06-19, 11:40, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > This patch adds support to parsing device tree based > SoundWire slave devices. > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 2 +- > drivers/soundwire/bus.h | 1 + > drivers/soundwire/slave.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c > index fe745830a261..20f26cf4ba74 100644 > --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c > @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ int sdw_add_bus_master(struct sdw_bus *bus) > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) && ACPI_HANDLE(bus->dev)) > ret = sdw_acpi_find_slaves(bus); > else > - ret = -ENOTSUPP; /* No ACPI/DT so error out */ > + ret = sdw_of_find_slaves(bus); > > if (ret) { > dev_err(bus->dev, "Finding slaves failed:%d\n", ret); > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.h b/drivers/soundwire/bus.h > index 3048ca153f22..ee46befedbd1 100644 > --- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.h > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.h > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ static inline int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus) > } > #endif > > +int sdw_of_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus); > void sdw_extract_slave_id(struct sdw_bus *bus, > u64 addr, struct sdw_slave_id *id); > > diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/slave.c b/drivers/soundwire/slave.c > index f39a5815e25d..6e7f5cfeb854 100644 > --- a/drivers/soundwire/slave.c > +++ b/drivers/soundwire/slave.c > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > // Copyright(c) 2015-17 Intel Corporation. > > #include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h> > #include <linux/soundwire/sdw_type.h> > #include "bus.h" > @@ -28,13 +29,14 @@ static int sdw_slave_add(struct sdw_bus *bus, > slave->dev.parent = bus->dev; > slave->dev.fwnode = fwnode; > > - /* name shall be sdw:link:mfg:part:class:unique */ > + /* name shall be sdw:link:mfg:part:class */
nope we are not changing dev_set_name below so this comment should not be modified > dev_set_name(&slave->dev, "sdw:%x:%x:%x:%x:%x", > bus->link_id, id->mfg_id, id->part_id, > id->class_id, id->unique_id); > > slave->dev.release = sdw_slave_release; > slave->dev.bus = &sdw_bus_type; > + slave->dev.of_node = of_node_get(to_of_node(fwnode)); > slave->bus = bus; > slave->status = SDW_SLAVE_UNATTACHED; > slave->dev_num = 0; > @@ -112,3 +114,53 @@ int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus) > } > > #endif > + > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) > +/* > + * sdw_of_find_slaves() - Find Slave devices in master device tree node > + * @bus: SDW bus instance > + * > + * Scans Master DT node for SDW child Slave devices and registers it. > + */ > +int sdw_of_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct device *dev = bus->dev; > + struct device_node *node; > + > + if (!bus->dev->of_node) > + return 0; this should be error, otherwise next condition of checking slaves wont be triggered.. > + > + for_each_child_of_node(bus->dev->of_node, node) { > + struct sdw_slave_id id; > + const char *compat = NULL; > + int unique_id, ret; > + int ver, mfg_id, part_id, class_id; > + compat = of_get_property(node, "compatible", NULL); > + if (!compat) > + continue; > + > + ret = sscanf(compat, "sdw%x,%x,%x,%x", > + &ver, &mfg_id, &part_id, &class_id); > + if (ret != 4) { > + dev_err(dev, "Manf ID & Product code not found %s\n", > + compat); > + continue; > + } > + > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "sdw-instance-id", &unique_id); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "Instance id not found:%d\n", ret); > + continue; > + } > + > + id.sdw_version = ver - 0xF; > + id.unique_id = unique_id; > + id.mfg_id = mfg_id; > + id.part_id = part_id; > + id.class_id = class_id; > + sdw_slave_add(bus, &id, of_fwnode_handle(node)); > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +#endif > -- > 2.21.0 -- ~Vinod