On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:55:52PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 01-Jul 11:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hmmm? > > Just one more requirement I think it's worth to consider since the > beginning: CGroups support > > That would be very welcome interface. Just because is so much more > convenient (and safe) to set these bias on a group of tasks depending > on their role in the system. > > Do you have any idea on how we can expose such a "lantency-nice" > property via CGroups? It's very similar to cpu.shares but it does not > represent a resource which can be partitioned. If the latency_nice idea lives; exactly like the normal nice? That is; IIRC cgroupv2 has a nice value interface (see cpu_weight_nice_*()). But yes, this isn't a resource per se; just a shared attribute like thing.
