On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 07:42 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Switch to our own constant for the satp register instead of using > the old name from a legacy version of the privileged spec. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> > --- > arch/riscv/mm/context.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > index 89ceb3cbe218..beeb5d7f92ea 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > @@ -57,12 +57,7 @@ void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct > mm_struct *next, > cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev)); > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next)); > > - /* > - * Use the old spbtr name instead of using the current satp > - * name to support binutils 2.29 which doesn't know about the > - * privileged ISA 1.10 yet. > - */ > - csr_write(sptbr, virt_to_pfn(next->pgd) | SATP_MODE); > + csr_write(CSR_SATP, virt_to_pfn(next->pgd) | SATP_MODE); > local_flush_tlb_all(); > > flush_icache_deferred(next);
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.pa...@wdc.com> -- Regards, Atish
