On 03/07/2019 03:42, Dan Williams wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 5:23 PM Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]> wrote: <> > > Yes, but the trick is how to manage cases where someone waiting on one > type needs to be woken up by an event on the other.
Exactly I'm totally with you on this. > So all I'm saying it lets live with more hash collisions until we can figure > out a race > free way to better scale waitqueue usage. > Yes and lets actually do real measurements to see if this really hurts needlessly. Maybe not so much Thanks Boaz <>
