On 27/05/2019 15:38, Neil Armstrong wrote: > While the text specifies "of the GPL or the X11 license" the actual > license text matches the MIT license as specified at [0] > > [0] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi | 44 +---------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi > index 65585255910a..2d31b7ce3f8c 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/meson6.dtsi > @@ -1,48 +1,6 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR MIT > /* > * Copyright 2014 Carlo Caione <ca...@caione.org> > - * > - * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms > - * of the GPL or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual > - * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a > - * whole. > - * > - * a) This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > - * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as > - * published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the > - * License, or (at your option) any later version.
You seem to have been so focused on the X11 vs MIT issue that you might have overlooked the GPL issue? You selected "GPL-2.0", while the text called for "GPL-2.0+" (GNU General Public License v2.0 or later) (Pointed out by Maxime in a similar patch.) Regards.
