Em Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 09:48:08AM +0800, Leo Yan escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 01:07:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 06:34:09PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > > When I used static checker Smatch for perf building, the main target is > > > to check if there have any potential issues in Arm cs-etm code. So > > > finally I get many reporting for errors/warnings. > > > > > > I used below command for using static checker with perf building: > > > > > > # make VF=1 CORESIGHT=1 -C tools/perf/ \ > > > CHECK="/root/Work/smatch/smatch --full-path" \ > > > CC=/root/Work/smatch/cgcc | tee smatch_reports.txt > > > > > > I reviewed the errors one by one, if I understood some of these errors > > > so changed the code as I can, this patch set is the working result; but > > > still leave some errors due to I don't know what's the best way to fix > > > it. There also have many inconsistent indenting warnings. So I firstly > > > send out this patch set and let's see what's the feedback from public > > > reviewing. > > > > > > Leo Yan (11): > > > perf report: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf stat: Smatch: Fix use-after-freed pointer > > > perf top: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf annotate: Smatch: Fix dereferencing freed memory > > > perf trace: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf hists: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf map: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf session: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf intel-bts: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf intel-pt: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > perf cs-etm: Smatch: Fix potential NULL pointer dereference > > > > from quick look it all looks good to me, nice tool ;-) > > > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org> > > Thanks for reviewing, Jiri. > > @Arnaldo, Just want to check, will you firstly pick up 01~05, 07, > 08/11 patches if you think they are okay? Or you want to wait me to > spin new patch set with all patches after I gather all comments?
I'm picking up the uncontrovertial, will push to my perf/core branch, continue from there, please. - Arnaldo > Thanks, > Leo Yan > > > > tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 4 ++-- > > > tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 2 +- > > > tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 8 ++++++-- > > > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 5 +++-- > > > tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 13 +++++++++---- > > > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 6 ++---- > > > tools/perf/util/cs-etm.c | 2 +- > > > tools/perf/util/intel-bts.c | 5 ++--- > > > tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c | 5 ++--- > > > tools/perf/util/map.c | 7 +++++-- > > > tools/perf/util/session.c | 3 +++ > > > 11 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > -- - Arnaldo
