On 03.07.2019 22:36, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 10:12:12PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> On 03.07.2019 21:37, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>>> The RTL8211E has extension pages, which can be accessed after
>>> selecting a page through a custom method. Add a function to
>>> modify bits in a register of an extension page and a helper for
>>> selecting an ext page.
>>>
>>> rtl8211e_modify_ext_paged() is inspired by its counterpart
>>> phy_modify_paged().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - assign .read/write_page handlers for RTL8211E
>>
>> Maybe this was planned, but it's not part of the patch.
>
> Oops, it was definitely there when I tested ... I guess this got
> somehow lost when changing the patch order and resolving minor
> conflicts, seems like I only build tested after that :/
>
RTL8211E also supports normal pages (reg 0x1f = page).
See e.g. rtl8168e_2_hw_phy_config in the r8169 driver, this network
chip has an integrated RTL8211E PHY. There settings on page 3 and 5
are done.
Therefore I would prefer to use .read/write_page for normal paging
in all Realtek PHY drivers. Means the code here would remain as it
is and just the changelog would need to be fixed.
>>> - use phy_select_page() and phy_restore_page(), get rid of
>>> rtl8211e_restore_page()
>>> - s/rtl821e_select_ext_page/rtl8211e_select_ext_page/
>>> - updated commit message
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/phy/realtek.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c b/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
>>> index eb815cbe1e72..9cd6241e2a6d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/realtek.c
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
>>> #define RTL821x_EXT_PAGE_SELECT 0x1e
>>> #define RTL821x_PAGE_SELECT 0x1f
>>>
>>> +#define RTL8211E_EXT_PAGE 7
>>> +#define RTL8211E_EPAGSR 0x1e
>>> +
>>> /* RTL8211E page 5 */
>>> #define RTL8211E_EEE_LED_MODE1 0x05
>>> #define RTL8211E_EEE_LED_MODE2 0x06
>>> @@ -58,6 +61,44 @@ static int rtl821x_write_page(struct phy_device *phydev,
>>> int page)
>>> return __phy_write(phydev, RTL821x_PAGE_SELECT, page);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static int rtl8211e_select_ext_page(struct phy_device *phydev, int page)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret, oldpage;
>>> +
>>> + oldpage = phy_select_page(phydev, RTL8211E_EXT_PAGE);
>>> + if (oldpage < 0)
>>> + return oldpage;
>>> +
>>> + ret = __phy_write(phydev, RTL8211E_EPAGSR, page);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return phy_restore_page(phydev, page, ret);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int __maybe_unused rtl8211e_modify_ext_paged(struct phy_device
>>> *phydev,
>>> + int page, u32 regnum, u16 mask, u16 set)
>>
>> This __maybe_unused isn't too nice as you use the function in a subsequent
>> patch.
>
> It's needed to avoid a compiler warning (unless we don't care about
> that for an interim version), the attribute is removed again in the
> next patch.
>
OK
