> On Jul 3, 2019, at 1:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Nadav,
> 
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Jul 3, 2019, at 3:54 AM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> void default_send_IPI_all(int vector)
>>> {
>>> -   if (apic_ipi_shorthand_off || vector == NMI_VECTOR) {
>>> +   if (static_branch_likely(&apic_use_ipi_shorthand)) {
>>>             apic->send_IPI_mask(cpu_online_mask, vector);
>>>     } else {
>>>             __default_send_IPI_shortcut(APIC_DEST_ALLINC, vector);
>> 
>> It may be better to check the static-key in native_send_call_func_ipi() (and
>> other callers if there are any), and remove all the other checks in
>> default_send_IPI_all(), x2apic_send_IPI_mask_allbutself(), etc.
> 
> That makes sense. Should have thought about that myself, but hunting that
> APIC emulation issue was affecting my brain obviously :)

Well, if you used VMware and not KVM... ;-)

(allow me to reemphasize that I am joking and save myself from spam)

>> void native_send_call_func_ipi(const struct cpumask *mask)
>> {
>> -    cpumask_var_t allbutself;
>> -
>> -    if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&allbutself, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
>> -            apic->send_IPI_mask(mask, CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
>> -            return;
>> +    int cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> +    bool allbutself = true;
>> +    bool self = false;
>> +
>> +    for_each_cpu_and_not(cpu, cpu_online_mask, mask) {
>> +
>> +            if (cpu != this_cpu) {
>> +                    allbutself = false;
>> +                    break;
>> +            }
>> +            self = true;
> 
> That accumulates to a large iteration in the worst case. 

I don’t understand why. There should be at most two iterations - one for
self and one for another core. So _find_next_bit() will be called at most
twice. _find_next_bit() has its own loop, but I don’t think overall it is as
bad as calling alloc_cpumask_var(), cpumask_copy() and cpumask_equal(),
which also have loops.

I don’t have numbers (and I doubt they are very significant), but the cpumask
allocation showed when I was profiling my microbenchmark.

Reply via email to