On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 10:51:26 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > index 779ec11f61bd..a7b06291e32c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/functions
> > > @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ initialize_ftrace() { # Reset ftrace to initial-state
> > > reset_events_filter
> > > reset_ftrace_filter
> > > disable_events
> > > - echo > set_event_pid # event tracer is always on
> > > - echo > set_ftrace_pid
> > > + [ -f set_event_pid ] && echo > set_event_pid # event tracer is
> > > always on
> >
> > I probably should remove that comment, because I believe that was why
> > it wasn't tested :-/
>
> Hmm, OK. I think this comment means "the event tracer is always on if clearing
> set_event_pid filter". Would this need to be removed?
When this was added in commit 131f840d5b7 ("selftests: ftrace:
Initialize ftrace before each test"), we had this:
+ echo > set_event_pid # event tracer is always on
+ [ -f set_ftrace_filter ] && echo | tee set_ftrace_*
+ [ -f set_graph_function ] && echo | tee set_graph_*
+ [ -f stack_trace_filter ] && echo > stack_trace_filter
+ [ -f kprobe_events ] && echo > kprobe_events
+ [ -f uprobe_events ] && echo > uprobe_events
Where set_event_pid is the only file not tested for existence. I
figured that comment was the reason for not testing it. If that was the
case, then adding a test, I would think we should remove the comment.
Do you agree?
-- Steve
>
> Thank you,
>
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> >
> > > + [ -f set_ftrace_pid ] && echo > set_ftrace_pid
> > > [ -f set_ftrace_filter ] && echo | tee set_ftrace_*
> > > [ -f set_graph_function ] && echo | tee set_graph_*
> > > [ -f stack_trace_filter ] && echo > stack_trace_filter
> >
>
>
