On 7/4/19 9:19 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Shijith Thotton wrote:
>> On 7/4/19 12:13 AM, Julien Thierry wrote:
>>> Looking at handle_percpu_irq(), I think this might be acceptable. But
>>> does it make sense to only have kstats for percpu NMIs?
>>>
>>
>> It would be better to have stats for both.
>>
>> handle_fasteoi_nmi() can use __kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu() if below
>> change can be added to kstat_irqs_cpu().
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
>> index a92b33593b8d..9484e88dabc2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
>> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
>> @@ -950,6 +950,11 @@ unsigned int kstat_irqs_cpu(unsigned int irq, int cpu)
>> *per_cpu_ptr(desc->kstat_irqs, cpu) : 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool irq_is_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> + return desc->istate & IRQS_NMI;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * kstat_irqs - Get the statistics for an interrupt
>> * @irq: The interrupt number
>> @@ -967,7 +972,8 @@ unsigned int kstat_irqs(unsigned int irq)
>> if (!desc || !desc->kstat_irqs)
>> return 0;
>> if (!irq_settings_is_per_cpu_devid(desc) &&
>> - !irq_settings_is_per_cpu(desc))
>> + !irq_settings_is_per_cpu(desc) &&
>> + !irq_is_nmi(desc))
>> return desc->tot_count;
>>
>> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>>
>>
>> Thomas,
>> Please suggest a better way if any.
>
> Looks good.
>
Thanks Thomas. Will share v2 with the changes.
Thanks,
Shijith
