> >> This is correct but missing that the above 'return ret' is broken, too.
> >> ret is initialized but 0 in that case.
> > 
> > Nice catch! Oh well, given enough eyeballs, ...
> 
> I don't think ret is initialized, reg is, not ret .

It is initialized for the broken 'return ret' *above* the one which gets
rightfully fixed in this patch.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to