On 05/07/19 17:23, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> 
> Retry tune per-vCPU timer_advance_ns if adaptive tuning goes insane which 
> can happen sporadically in product environment.
> 
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>  * retry max 10 times if adaptive tuning goes insane

Is there any advantage at stopping the retry (also it should not be a
local variable of course).

Paolo

>  arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 95affa5..bd0dbe5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1538,6 +1538,7 @@ static inline void adjust_lapic_timer_advance(struct 
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>       struct kvm_lapic *apic = vcpu->arch.apic;
>       u32 timer_advance_ns = apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns;
>       u64 ns;
> +     uint retry_count = 0;
>  
>       /* too early */
>       if (advance_expire_delta < 0) {
> @@ -1556,8 +1557,10 @@ static inline void adjust_lapic_timer_advance(struct 
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>       if (abs(advance_expire_delta) < LAPIC_TIMER_ADVANCE_ADJUST_DONE)
>               apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
>       if (unlikely(timer_advance_ns > 5000)) {
> -             timer_advance_ns = 0;
> -             apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
> +             timer_advance_ns = 1000;
> +             apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = false;
> +             if (++retry_count > 10)
> +                     apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_adjust_done = true;
>       }
>       apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns = timer_advance_ns;
>  }
> 

Reply via email to