When CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM is disabled, we get a build failure
for calling a nonexisting memcg_expand_shrinker_maps():
mm/vmscan.c:220:7: error: implicit declaration of function
'memcg_expand_shrinker_maps' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(id)) {
^
mm/vmscan.c:220:7: error: this function declaration is not a prototype
[-Werror,-Wstrict-prototypes]
mm/vmscan.c:608:56: error: no member named 'shrinker_map' in 'struct
mem_cgroup_per_node'
map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/linux/rcupdate.h:498:31: note: expanded from macro
'rcu_dereference_protected'
__rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
^
include/linux/rcupdate.h:321:12: note: expanded from macro
'__rcu_dereference_protected'
((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
^
mm/vmscan.c:608:6: error: assigning to 'struct memcg_shrinker_map *' from
incompatible type 'void'
map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
and another issue trying to access invalid struct fields:
mm/vmscan.c:608:56: error: no member named 'shrinker_map' in 'struct
mem_cgroup_per_node'
map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/linux/rcupdate.h:498:31: note: expanded from macro
'rcu_dereference_protected'
__rcu_dereference_protected((p), (c), __rcu)
^
include/linux/rcupdate.h:321:12: note: expanded from macro
'__rcu_dereference_protected'
((typeof(*p) __force __kernel *)(p)); \
^
mm/vmscan.c:608:6: error: assigning to 'struct memcg_shrinker_map *' from
incompatible type 'void'
map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
Add a dummy definition for memcg_expand_shrinker_maps() that always fails,
and hide the obviously nonworking shrink_slab_memcg() function.
Fixes: 8236f517d69e ("mm: shrinker: make shrinker not depend on memcg kmem")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
No idea what the intended behavior is supposed to be for this case.
Rather than failing, should we actually provide that function?
Or maybe a more elaborate change is needed?
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 5 +++++
mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 5901a90f58eb..6b15e2066fc7 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1407,6 +1407,11 @@ static inline void memcg_put_cache_ids(void)
{
}
+static inline int memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
+{
+ return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
static inline void memcg_set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
int nid, int shrinker_id) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a0301edd8d03..323a9c50c0fe 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control
*shrinkctl,
return freed;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int priority)
{
--
2.20.0
