Apparently this was a bit premature, at least I still get this warning with gcc-8.1:
kernel/bpf/core.o: warning: objtool: ___bpf_prog_run()+0x44d2: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame This reverts commit b22cf36c189f31883ad0238a69ccf82aa1f3b16b. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> --- kernel/bpf/core.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 7e98f36a14e2..16079550db6d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1299,7 +1299,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) { #define BPF_INSN_2_LBL(x, y) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y] = &&x##_##y #define BPF_INSN_3_LBL(x, y, z) [BPF_##x | BPF_##y | BPF_##z] = &&x##_##y##_##z - static const void * const jumptable[256] __annotate_jump_table = { + static const void *jumptable[256] = { [0 ... 255] = &&default_label, /* Now overwrite non-defaults ... */ BPF_INSN_MAP(BPF_INSN_2_LBL, BPF_INSN_3_LBL), @@ -1558,6 +1558,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) BUG_ON(1); return 0; } +STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(___bpf_prog_run); /* jump table */ #define PROG_NAME(stack_size) __bpf_prog_run##stack_size #define DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN(stack_size) \ -- 2.20.0
