On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 09:23:14AM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> In some cases, an event may be created without needing a counter
> allocation. For example, an lbr event may be created by the host
> only to help save/restore the lbr stack on the vCPU context switching.
> 
> This patch adds a new interface to allow users to create a perf event
> without the need of counter assignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> ---

I _really_ hate this one.

>  arch/x86/events/core.c     | 12 ++++++++++++
>  include/linux/perf_event.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>  kernel/events/core.c       | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index f315425..eebbd65 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ int x86_setup_perfctr(struct perf_event *event)
>       struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>       u64 config;
>  
> +     if (is_no_counter_event(event))
> +             return 0;
> +
>       if (!is_sampling_event(event)) {
>               hwc->sample_period = x86_pmu.max_period;
>               hwc->last_period = hwc->sample_period;
> @@ -1248,6 +1251,12 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event *event, int 
> flags)
>       hwc = &event->hw;
>  
>       n0 = cpuc->n_events;
> +
> +     if (is_no_counter_event(event)) {
> +             n = n0;
> +             goto done_collect;
> +     }
> +
>       ret = n = collect_events(cpuc, event, false);
>       if (ret < 0)
>               goto out;
> @@ -1422,6 +1431,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_del(struct perf_event *event, int 
> flags)
>       if (cpuc->txn_flags & PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD)
>               goto do_del;
>  
> +     if (is_no_counter_event(event))
> +             goto do_del;
> +
>       /*
>        * Not a TXN, therefore cleanup properly.
>        */

That's truely an abomination.

> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index 0ab99c7..19e6593 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ typedef void (*perf_overflow_handler_t)(struct perf_event 
> *,
>   */
>  #define PERF_EV_CAP_SOFTWARE         BIT(0)
>  #define PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG  BIT(1)
> +#define PERF_EV_CAP_NO_COUNTER               BIT(2)
>  
>  #define SWEVENT_HLIST_BITS           8
>  #define SWEVENT_HLIST_SIZE           (1 << SWEVENT_HLIST_BITS)
> @@ -895,6 +896,13 @@ extern int perf_event_refresh(struct perf_event *event, 
> int refresh);
>  extern void perf_event_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event);
>  extern int perf_event_release_kernel(struct perf_event *event);
>  extern struct perf_event *
> +perf_event_create(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> +               int cpu,
> +               struct task_struct *task,
> +               perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler,
> +               void *context,
> +               bool counter_assignment);
> +extern struct perf_event *
>  perf_event_create_kernel_counter(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
>                               int cpu,
>                               struct task_struct *task,

Why the heck are you creating this wrapper nonsense?

Reply via email to