On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Jul 8, 2019, at 3:35 AM, Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Anything less than the actual number of present CPUs is problematic except
> > you use the 'let's hope nothing happens' approach. We could add an option
> > to stop the bringup at the early online state similar to what we do for
> > 'nosmt'.
> >
> How about we change nr_cpus to do that instead so we never have to have
> this conversation again?
Actually not the worst idea. We have all the infrastructure already.
Thanks,
tglx
