On 08.07.2019 22:08, Liu Bo wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 06:29:57PM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
After commit 991f61fe7e1d ("Blk-throttle: reduce tail io latency when iops
limit is enforced") wait time could be zero even if group is throttled and
cannot issue requests right now. As a result throtl_select_dispatch() turns
into busy-loop under irq-safe queue spinlock.
Fix is simple: always round up target time to the next throttle slice.
Fixes: 991f61fe7e1d ("Blk-throttle: reduce tail io latency when iops limit is
enforced")
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebni...@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
---
block/blk-throttle.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index 9ea7c0ecad10..8ab6c8153223 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -881,13 +881,10 @@ static bool tg_with_in_iops_limit(struct throtl_grp *tg,
struct bio *bio,
unsigned long jiffy_elapsed, jiffy_wait, jiffy_elapsed_rnd;
u64 tmp;
- jiffy_elapsed = jiffy_elapsed_rnd = jiffies - tg->slice_start[rw];
-
- /* Slice has just started. Consider one slice interval */
- if (!jiffy_elapsed)
- jiffy_elapsed_rnd = tg->td->throtl_slice;
+ jiffy_elapsed = jiffies - tg->slice_start[rw];
- jiffy_elapsed_rnd = roundup(jiffy_elapsed_rnd, tg->td->throtl_slice);
+ /* Round up to the next throttle slice, wait time must be nonzero */
+ jiffy_elapsed_rnd = roundup(jiffy_elapsed + 1, tg->td->throtl_slice);
/*
* jiffy_elapsed_rnd should not be a big value as minimum iops can be
Did you use a tiny iops limit to run into this?
Yep. 25 iops
also kernel built with HZ=250, this might be related
thanks,
-liubo
