On 08-07-19, 16:13, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2019-07-08 14:58:40, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Though it makes me wonder why I didn't hit this thing. I was using the > > cpu_cooling device the other day, which calls cpufreq_update_policy() > > very frequently on heat-up. And I had a hair dryer blowing over my > > board to heat it up. Lemme check that again :) > > Can you test on some x86 ACPI? No dryers needed :-). >
Found out why I didn't hit it then. I tested it after converting cpu_cooling driver to use QoS APIs and there is no double locking with that. -- viresh
