Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hah, I suspected as much but didn't have a chance to look yet. I had > plans to replace that sub_if_list with an RCU list and not require the > lock there, but that's far off. Any ideas how to fix this? We can't > reject the master stop so we have to walk the list, I guess we'll have > to audit the other list manipulation places, I think they're all under > RTNL.
Yeah I think they're all under RTNL too. So you don't need to take the lock here at all since you should already have the RTNL. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
