On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 07:43:19PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 7:02 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin > <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 06:54:06PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:23 PM Russell King - ARM Linux admin > > > <li...@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 01:30:24PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > > > I have a question about the following code > > > > > in arch/arm/Makefile: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > # Do we have FASTFPE? > > > > > FASTFPE :=arch/arm/fastfpe > > > > > ifeq ($(FASTFPE),$(wildcard $(FASTFPE))) > > > > > FASTFPE_OBJ :=$(FASTFPE)/ > > > > > endif > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since arch/arm/fastfpe does not exist in the upstream tree, > > > > > I guess this is a hook to compile downstream source code. > > > > > > > > > > If a user puts arch/arm/fastfpe/ into their local source tree, > > > > > Kbuild is supposed to compile the files in it. > > > > > > > > > > Is this correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, I am afraid this would not work for O= building. > > > > > > > > > > $(wildcard ...) checks if this directory exists in the *objtree*, > > > > > while scripts/Makefile.build needs to include > > > > > arch/arm/fastfpe/Makefile from *srctree*. > > > > > > > > > > I think the correct code should be like follows: > > > > > > > > > > # Do we have FASTFPE? > > > > > FASTFPE :=arch/arm/fastfpe > > > > > ifneq ($(wildcard $(srctree)/$(FASTFPE)),) > > > > > FASTFPE_OBJ :=$(FASTFPE)/ > > > > > endif > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Having said that, I am not sure this code is worth fixing. > > > > > > > > > > This code was added around v2.5.1.9, > > > > > > > > ... as a _result_ of a discussion and deciding not to upstream it, > > > > but to still allow its use. Fastfpe is faster than nwfpe (so has > > > > a definite advantage for FP intensive applications) but we decided > > > > we didn't want two FP emulation codes in the kernel. However, if > > > > someone wants to use it, it has to be built into the kernel, it > > > > can't be modular. > > > > > > > > > IMHO, the entry in Makefile and Kconfig should be removed > > > from upstream, then moved to a part of the fastfpe local patch. > > > > Nope. It means that rather than it being merely a drop-in, it has > > to be maintained against changes to both these files. Sorry, that's > > more work. > > > This is the motivation of upstreaming for everybody. > > We never know the code that does not exist in upstream. > Downstream code must pay maintenance cost for ever.
I'm the maintainer of the files in question. I also care-take fastfpe. It's my choice to make. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up