On 11/07/19 03:25, Eric Hankland wrote:
>
> +/* for KVM_CAP_PMU_EVENT_FILTER */
> +struct kvm_pmu_event_filter {
> + __u32 type;
> + __u32 nevents;
> + __u64 events[0];
> +};
> +
> +#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_WHITELIST 0
> +#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_BLACKLIST 1
> +"type" is a bit vague, so I am thinking of replacing it with "action" and rename the constants to KVM_PMU_EVENT_ACCEPT/REJECT. What do you think? Paolo
