On Mon 2007-09-03 04:58:58, Jeff Garzik wrote: > David Schwartz wrote: > >Either license can grant you the right to distribute > >it, but how you get the > >rights to distribute has *NO* effect on the recipient. > >They receive a lawful > >copy and any rights the original author grants them > >under a license from > >that original author. You have no power to grant or > >modify rights to the > >original work. > > Secondary parties have the power to grant or modify > rights, if delegated to them by the original author. > > Relicensing and transfer of rights happens all the time. > How do you think most music gets into consumer hands?
License is only a promise not to sue. Only original author is permitted to sue in BSD/GPL case. David seems right here. If Linus releases GPL/BSD program, you choose GPL and distribute it to me, and I put it into proprietary evil app, I am _ok_. You can't sue me, because you are not copyright holder. Linus can't sue me, because he BSD licensed it. => I'm fine. Yep, copyright law is strange, and you may be right outside U.S. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/