On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Hakan Lennestal wrote:
>
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Woodhouse writes:
> > >
> > > The IBM DTLA drives aren't in the hpt366 bad_ata66_4 list still.
> >
> > I second this !
> > Until the hpt-problem is solved (if it ever will be)
> > we really need the IBM DTLA drives in the bad-list.
> > This configuration (IBM DTLA disks on hpt3* controller) can't be
> > that unusual ?
>
> So why are the IBM drives picked on? I thought this was a hpt366 problem,
> and possibly has only shown up with IBM drives so far.
>
> It sounds like the proper fix would be to not enable ata66 by default.
>
LT,
This is one of the evolution timing issues that both the drive guys and
the chipset guys point fingers, while both attempt to fix the problem in
their BIOS/Diskware.
Regards,
Andre Hedrick
CTO Timpanogas Research Group
EVP Linux Development, TRG
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
