On 04/07/19 10:49, Juri Lelli wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/07/19 07:51, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 10:27:31AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > IIRC TJ figured it wasn't strictly required to fix the lock invertion at > > > that time and they sorted it differently. If I (re)read the thread > > > correctly the other day, he didn't have fundamental objections against > > > it, but wanted the simpler fix. > > > > Yeah I've got no objections to the change itself, it just wasn't > > needed at the time. We've had multiple issues there tho, so please > > keep an eye open after the changes get merged. > > Should I take this as an indication that you had a look at the set and > (apart from Peter's comments) you are OK with them? > > If that's the case I will send a v9 out soon. Otherwise I'd kindly ask > you to please have a look.
Gentle ping. Thanks, Juri
