On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, J Sloan wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Bzzt, wrong. Red Hat 7 compiles the 2.4 tree beautifully with gcc 2.96 as well.
> > Please grow up.
>
> Yes indeed - on my quad CPU Red Hat 7 server, I accidentally
> forgot to say CC=kgcc during the last kernel build, and ended
> up with a gcc-2.96 built kernel. I decided to let it run and see
> what happens - It's been up and running -test12 for about 20
> days now, solid as a rock.
Same here, forgot to do CC=kgcc when compiling 2.4-prerelease and my PIII
box is running happily (only 1.5 days uptime at the point but...) Compiled
with the errata gcc 2.96.
- Panu -
>
> My home system, an AMD k6, likewise is very very happy
> running 2.4.0-prerelase compiled with gcc 2.96
>
> jjs
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
- Panu -
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
