On 7/12/2019 11:13 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:29:05PM +0800, Tao Xu wrote:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 46af3a5e9209..a4d5da34b306 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -2048,6 +2048,7 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, 
struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
                                  SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID |
                                  SECONDARY_EXEC_RDTSCP |
                                  SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES |
+                                 SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE |
                                  SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
                                  SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
                                  SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index d98eac371c0a..f411c9ae5589 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2247,6 +2247,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config 
*vmcs_conf,
                        SECONDARY_EXEC_RDRAND_EXITING |
                        SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML |
                        SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING |
+                       SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE |
                        SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_USE_GPA |
                        SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_CONCEAL_VMX |
                        SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC |
@@ -3984,6 +3985,25 @@ static void vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control(struct 
vcpu_vmx *vmx)
                }
        }
+ if (vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
+               SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE) {

This should be aligned with the beginning of the conditional.
Alternatively, add a vmx_waitpkg_supported() helper, which is fairly
ubiquitous even when there is only a single call site.


OK, Thank you for your suggestion.
+               /* Exposing WAITPKG only when WAITPKG is exposed */
No need for this comment.  It's also oddly worded, e.g. the second
"exposed" should probably be "enabled"?

+               bool waitpkg_enabled =
+                       guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG);
+
+               if (!waitpkg_enabled)
+                       exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE;
+
+               if (nested) {
+                       if (waitpkg_enabled)
+                               vmx->nested.msrs.secondary_ctls_high |=
+                                       SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE;
+                       else
+                               vmx->nested.msrs.secondary_ctls_high &=
+                                       ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE;
+               }
+       }
+
        vmx->secondary_exec_control = exec_control;
  }
--
2.20.1


Reply via email to