On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:04:29 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:00:01 -0700 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:07:34 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > > > Changelog: > > > - markers_mutex now nests inside module_mutex rather than the opposite. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Reviewed-by: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Documentation/SubmittingPatches recognizes Signed-off-by: and > > Acked-by:. Nothing about Reviewed-by. Quote: > > > > Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the > > acker > > has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance. > > > > Reviewed-by: carries no such connotation or indication IMO. > > Please use Acked-by if that's what these reviewers have done. > > Yeah. We will start introducing Reviewed-by: (I haven't yet quite worked > out how yet) but it will be a quite formal thing and it would be something > which the reviewer explicitly provided. For now, let's please stick with > acked-by (if those individuals did indeed send an acked-by) > -
Thanks. I look forward to the explanation of Reviewed-by, what it means, and how it differs from Acked-by. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
