On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 11:25:05AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote: > A TODO has been sitting in task_tick_numa() regarding init'ing the > task_numa_work() task_work in sched_fork() rather than in task_tick_numa(), > so I figured I'd have a go at it. > > Patches 1 & 2 do that, and patch 3 is a freebie cleanup. > > Briefly tested on a 2 * (Xeon E5-2690) system, didn't see any obvious > breakage. > > Valentin Schneider (3): > sched/fair: Move init_numa_balancing() below task_numa_work() > sched/fair: Move task_numa_work() init to init_numa_balancing() > sched/fair: Change task_numa_work() storage to static > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Thanks!
