On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 08:34 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > + * Continue to iterate over rcu list of given type, continuing after > > + * the current position. > > Please add something like the following to this comment: > > Note that the caller is responsible for making sure that > the element remains in place between the earlier iterator > and this one. One way to do this is to ensure that > both iterators are covered by the same rcu_read_lock(), > while others involve reference counts, flags, or mutexes.
Sure, will do. Should this comment also be added to list_for_each_continue_rcu()? johannes
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
