On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 03:25:34PM -0400, Alex Kogan wrote: > +/** > + * find_successor - Scan the main waiting queue looking for the first > + * thread running on the same node as the lock holder. If found (call it > + * thread T), move all threads in the main queue between the lock holder > + * and T to the end of the secondary queue and return T; otherwise, return > NULL. > + */ > +static struct cna_node *find_successor(struct mcs_spinlock *me)
Either don't use a kernel doc comment, but if you must, you have to stick to their format, otherwise we'll get endless stupid patches fixing up the stupid comment.
