On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:20:37AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > When this new flag is set, we can use single-shot output. > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com> > --- > include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h b/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h > index 674db7de64f3..439cbdfc3d9b 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h > @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ struct ptp_perout_request { > struct ptp_clock_time start; /* Absolute start time. */ > struct ptp_clock_time period; /* Desired period, zero means disable. */ > unsigned int index; /* Which channel to configure. */ > - unsigned int flags; /* Reserved for future use. */ > + > +#define PTP_PEROUT_ONE_SHOT BIT(0) > + unsigned int flags; /* Bit 0 -> oneshot output. */ > unsigned int rsv[4]; /* Reserved for future use. */
Unfortunately, the code never checked that .flags and .rsv are zero, and so the de-facto ABI makes extending these fields impossible. That was my mistake from the beginning. In order to actually support extensions, you will first have to introduce a new ioctl. Sorry, Richard > }; > > -- > 2.22.0 >