On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:20:37AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> When this new flag is set, we can use single-shot output.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h b/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h
> index 674db7de64f3..439cbdfc3d9b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ptp_clock.h
> @@ -67,7 +67,9 @@ struct ptp_perout_request {
>       struct ptp_clock_time start;  /* Absolute start time. */
>       struct ptp_clock_time period; /* Desired period, zero means disable. */
>       unsigned int index;           /* Which channel to configure. */
> -     unsigned int flags;           /* Reserved for future use. */
> +
> +#define PTP_PEROUT_ONE_SHOT BIT(0)
> +     unsigned int flags;           /* Bit 0 -> oneshot output. */
>       unsigned int rsv[4];          /* Reserved for future use. */

Unfortunately, the code never checked that .flags and .rsv are zero,
and so the de-facto ABI makes extending these fields impossible.  That
was my mistake from the beginning.

In order to actually support extensions, you will first have to
introduce a new ioctl.

Sorry,
Richard

>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.22.0
> 

Reply via email to