[PATCH v2 11/22] objtool: Add mcsafe_handle_tail() to the uaccess safe list

[Josh Poimboeuf]

After an objtool improvement, it's reporting that __memcpy_mcsafe() is
calling mcsafe_handle_tail() with AC=1:

  arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool: .fixup+0x13: call to 
mcsafe_handle_tail() with UACCESS enabled
  arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool:   __memcpy_mcsafe()+0x34: (alt)
  arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool:   __memcpy_mcsafe()+0xb: (branch)
  arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o: warning: objtool:   __memcpy_mcsafe()+0x0: <=== 
(func)

mcsafe_handle_tail() is basically an extension of __memcpy_mcsafe(), so
AC=1 is supposed to be set.  Add mcsafe_handle_tail() to the uaccess
safe list.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulni...@google.com>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
index 27818a93f0b1..fd8827114c74 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -490,6 +490,7 @@ static const char *uaccess_safe_builtin[] = {
        /* misc */
        "csum_partial_copy_generic",
        "__memcpy_mcsafe",
+       "mcsafe_handle_tail",
        "ftrace_likely_update", /* CONFIG_TRACE_BRANCH_PROFILING */
        NULL
 };
-- 
2.20.1