On 7/16/19 11:26 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> You don't need to make the separate patches according to
> the type of clock just in order to add the ID by handling them
> from devicetree.
> 
> Please merge following patches to one patch
> - patch2, patch4~patch7, patch9, patch11, patch12, patch14, patch17
> and separate from patch13, patch15, patch16 for adding the ID
I agree. The patches will be squashed.

Regards,
Lukasz
> 
> 
> On 19. 7. 15. 오후 9:43, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> The patch adds NoC WCORE clock IDs needed used for changing parent of the
>> main NoC clock from the DT device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.l...@partner.samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c | 10 ++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c 
>> b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> index 16ad498e3f3f..d353870e7fda 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
>> @@ -463,7 +463,8 @@ static const struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock
>>   static const struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5800_mux_clks[] __initconst = {
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_isp", mout_group3_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 0, 3),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_mscl", mout_group3_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 4, 3),
>> -    MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_wcore", mout_group2_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 16, 3),
>> +    MUX(CLK_MOUT_ACLK400_WCORE, "mout_aclk400_wcore", mout_group2_5800_p,
>> +                    SRC_TOP0, 16, 3),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk100_noc", mout_group1_5800_p, SRC_TOP0, 20, 2),
>>   
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk333_432_gscl", mout_group6_5800_p, SRC_TOP1, 0, 2),
>> @@ -548,7 +549,8 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock 
>> exynos5420_mux_clks[] __initconst = {
>>   
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_isp", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 0, 2),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_mscl", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 4, 2),
>> -    MUX(0, "mout_aclk400_wcore", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 16, 2),
>> +    MUX(CLK_MOUT_ACLK400_WCORE, "mout_aclk400_wcore", mout_group1_p,
>> +                    SRC_TOP0, 16, 2),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk100_noc", mout_group1_p, SRC_TOP0, 20, 2),
>>   
>>      MUX(0, "mout_aclk333_432_gscl", mout_group4_p, SRC_TOP1, 0, 2),
>> @@ -674,8 +676,8 @@ static const struct samsung_mux_clock 
>> exynos5x_mux_clks[] __initconst = {
>>                      SRC_TOP10, 8, 1),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_sw_aclk200_fsys2", mout_sw_aclk200_fsys2_p,
>>                      SRC_TOP10, 12, 1),
>> -    MUX(0, "mout_sw_aclk400_wcore", mout_sw_aclk400_wcore_p,
>> -                    SRC_TOP10, 16, 1),
>> +    MUX(CLK_MOUT_SW_ACLK400_WCORE, "mout_sw_aclk400_wcore",
>> +                    mout_sw_aclk400_wcore_p, SRC_TOP10, 16, 1),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_sw_aclk100_noc", mout_sw_aclk100_noc_p,
>>                      SRC_TOP10, 20, 1),
>>      MUX(0, "mout_sw_pclk200_fsys", mout_sw_pclk200_fsys_p,
>>
> 
> 

Reply via email to