On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:04:57AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Joerg,
>
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:43:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + if (!pmd_present(*pmd_k))
> > > > + return NULL;
> > > > else
> > > > BUG_ON(pmd_pfn(*pmd) != pmd_pfn(*pmd_k));
> > >
> > > So in case of unmap, this updates only the first entry in the pgd_list
> > > because vmalloc_sync_all() will break out of the iteration over pgd_list
> > > when NULL is returned from vmalloc_sync_one().
> > >
> > > I'm surely missing something, but how is that supposed to sync _all_ page
> > > tables on unmap as the changelog claims?
> >
> > No, you are right, I missed that. It is a bug in this patch, the code
> > that breaks out of the loop in vmalloc_sync_all() needs to be removed as
> > well. Will do that in the next version.
>
> I assume that p4d/pud do not need the pmd treatment, but a comment
> explaining why would be appreciated.
Actually there is already a comment in this function explaining why p4d
and pud don't need any treatment:
/*
* set_pgd(pgd, *pgd_k); here would be useless on PAE
* and redundant with the set_pmd() on non-PAE. As would
* set_p4d/set_pud.
*/
I couldn't say it with less words :)
Regards,
Joerg
