Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:12:58 +0200 Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>> [PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to cpustat->guest if
>> we
>> are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to cpustat->user instead of
>> cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code although
>> it
>> is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and user to
>> allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified "top(1)" is
>> able to display good cpu user time and cpu guest time by subtracting cpu
>> guest
>> time from cpu user time. Update "gtime" in task_struct accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Hi,
> Please use kernel-doc notation here:
> (see Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt or source file examples
> or ask)
>
> easy fix:
>
> /*
> + * Account guest cpu time to a process.
>
> /**
> * account_guest_time - Account guest cpu time to a process.
>
> + * @p: the process that the cpu time gets accounted to
> + * @cputime: the cpu time spent in virtual machine since the last update
> + */
> +void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime)
> +{
thank you for the comment.
But I just made a cut&past of the comment of the function above.
Should I be consistent with the doc or with the source ?
Laurent
--
------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------
"Software is hard" - Donald Knuth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
