On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:42:02 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> wrote:
> > I agree with Masami, that the selftest actually caught a bug here. I > > think the arch code may need to change as the purpose of Masami's > > changes was to enable kprobes earlier in boot. The selftest failing > > means that an early kprobe will fail too. > > I just got back from holiday and catching up with emails. Do I still > need to merge the arm64 fix making the debug initialisation a > core_initcall()? > > Can we actually get kprobes invoked before init_kprobes() has been > called? Bah, I can't remember everything that we discussed. I thought there was some more patches that obsoleted my work around. Everything has been pushed to Linus, can you see if the upstream still has issues for you? Thanks! -- Steve
