On Sun, Jul 21, 2019 at 09:20:38PM -0600, William Kucharski wrote:
> I suspect I'm being massively pedantic here, but the comments for 
> atomic_pte_lookup() note:
> 
>  * Only supports Intel large pages (2MB only) on x86_64.
>  *    ZZZ - hugepage support is incomplete
> 
> That makes me wonder how many systems using this hardware are actually 
> configured with CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE.
> 
> I ask as in the most common case, this is likely introducing a few extra 
> instructions and possibly an additional branch to a routine that is called 
> per-fault.
> 
> So the nit-picky questions are:
> 
> 1) Does the code really need to be cleaned up in this way?
> 
> 2) If it does, does it make more sense (given the way pmd_large() is handled 
> now in atomic_pte_lookup()) for this to be coded as:
> 
> if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
>       *pageshift = HPAGE_SHIFT;
> else
>       *pageshift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> 
> In all likelihood, these questions are no-ops, and the optimizer may even 
> make my questions completely moot, but I thought I might as well ask anyway.
> 
That sounds reasonable. I am not really sure as to how much of 
an improvement it would be, the condition will be evaluated eitherways
AFAIK? Eitherways, the ternary operator does not look good. I ll make a
version 2 of this.
> > On Jul 21, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Bharath Vedartham <linux.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > is_vm_hugetlb_page has checks for whether CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is defined
> > or not. If CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not defined is_vm_hugetlb_page will
> > always return false. There is no need to have an uneccessary
> > CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE check in the code.
> > 
> > Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivan...@sgi.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux...@kvack.org
> > Signed-off-by: Bharath Vedartham <linux.b...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c | 11 +++--------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c 
> > b/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> > index 61b3447..75108d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> > +++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-gru/grufault.c
> > @@ -180,11 +180,8 @@ static int non_atomic_pte_lookup(struct vm_area_struct 
> > *vma,
> > {
> >     struct page *page;
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> >     *pageshift = is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) ? HPAGE_SHIFT : PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -#else
> > -   *pageshift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -#endif
> > +
> >     if (get_user_pages(vaddr, 1, write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0, &page, NULL) <= 0)
> >             return -EFAULT;
> >     *paddr = page_to_phys(page);
> > @@ -238,11 +235,9 @@ static int atomic_pte_lookup(struct vm_area_struct 
> > *vma, unsigned long vaddr,
> >             return 1;
> > 
> >     *paddr = pte_pfn(pte) << PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> > +
> >     *pageshift = is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma) ? HPAGE_SHIFT : PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -#else
> > -   *pageshift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> > -#endif
> > +
> >     return 0;
> > 
> > err:
> > -- 
> > 2.7.4
> > 
> 

Reply via email to