From: Jia He <hejia...@gmail.com>

After skipping some invalid pfns in memmap_init_zone(), there is still
some room for improvement.

E.g. if pfn and pfn+1 are in the same memblock region, we can simply pfn++
instead of doing the binary search in memblock_next_valid_pfn.

Furthermore, if the pfn is in a gap of two memory region, skip to next
region directly to speedup the binary search.

Signed-off-by: Jia He <hejia...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohan...@huawei.com>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index d57ba51bb9cd..95d5916716a0 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -1256,28 +1256,53 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_set_node(phys_addr_t base, 
phys_addr_t size,
 unsigned long __init_memblock memblock_next_valid_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
 {
        struct memblock_type *type = &memblock.memory;
+       struct memblock_region *regions = type->regions;
        unsigned int right = type->cnt;
        unsigned int mid, left = 0;
+       unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, next_start_pfn;
        phys_addr_t addr = PFN_PHYS(++pfn);
+       static int early_region_idx __initdata_memblock = -1;
 
+       /* fast path, return pfn+1 if next pfn is in the same region */
+       if (early_region_idx != -1) {
+               start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
+               end_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base +
+                               regions[early_region_idx].size);
+
+               if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn < end_pfn)
+                       return pfn;
+
+               /* try slow path */
+               if (++early_region_idx == type->cnt)
+                       goto slow_path;
+
+               next_start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
+
+               if (pfn >= end_pfn && pfn <= next_start_pfn)
+                       return next_start_pfn;
+       }
+
+slow_path:
+       /* slow path, do the binary searching */
        do {
                mid = (right + left) / 2;
 
-               if (addr < type->regions[mid].base)
+               if (addr < regions[mid].base)
                        right = mid;
-               else if (addr >= (type->regions[mid].base +
-                                 type->regions[mid].size))
+               else if (addr >= (regions[mid].base + regions[mid].size))
                        left = mid + 1;
                else {
-                       /* addr is within the region, so pfn is valid */
+                       early_region_idx = mid;
                        return pfn;
                }
        } while (left < right);
 
        if (right == type->cnt)
                return -1UL;
-       else
-               return PHYS_PFN(type->regions[right].base);
+
+       early_region_idx = right;
+
+       return PHYS_PFN(regions[early_region_idx].base);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(memblock_next_valid_pfn);
 #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PFN_VALID */
-- 
2.19.1

Reply via email to