On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 01:48:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/7/23 下午1:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:55:28AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2019/7/22 下午4:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:21:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On 2019/7/21 下午6:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 03:08:00AM -0700, syzbot wrote: > > > > > > > syzbot has bisected this bug to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit 7f466032dc9e5a61217f22ea34b2df932786bbfc > > > > > > > Author: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> > > > > > > > Date: Fri May 24 08:12:18 2019 +0000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bisection log: > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=149a8a20600000 > > > > > > > start commit: 6d21a41b Add linux-next specific files for > > > > > > > 20190718 > > > > > > > git tree: linux-next > > > > > > > final crash: > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=169a8a20600000 > > > > > > > console output: > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=129a8a20600000 > > > > > > > kernel config: > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=3430a151e1452331 > > > > > > > dashboard link: > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e58112d71f77113ddb7b > > > > > > > syz repro: > > > > > > > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=10139e68600000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+e58112d71f77113dd...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > > > > > Fixes: 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel > > > > > > > virtual > > > > > > > address") > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For information about bisection process see: > > > > > > > https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection > > > > > > OK I poked at this for a bit, I see several things that > > > > > > we need to fix, though I'm not yet sure it's the reason for > > > > > > the failures: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. mmu_notifier_register shouldn't be called from > > > > > > vhost_vring_set_num_addr > > > > > > That's just a bad hack, > > > > > This is used to avoid holding lock when checking whether the > > > > > addresses are > > > > > overlapped. Otherwise we need to take spinlock for each invalidation > > > > > request > > > > > even if it was the va range that is not interested for us. This will > > > > > be very > > > > > slow e.g during guest boot. > > > > KVM seems to do exactly that. > > > > I tried and guest does not seem to boot any slower. > > > > Do you observe any slowdown? > > > > > > Yes I do. > > > > > > > > > > Now I took a hard look at the uaddr hackery it really makes > > > > me nervious. So I think for this release we want something > > > > safe, and optimizations on top. As an alternative revert the > > > > optimization and try again for next merge window. > > > > > > Will post a series of fixes, let me know if you're ok with that. > > > > > > Thanks > > I'd prefer you to take a hard look at the patch I posted > > which makes code cleaner, > > > I did. But it looks to me a series that is only about 60 lines of code can > fix all the issues we found without reverting the uaddr optimization. > > > > and ad optimizations on top. > > But other ways could be ok too. > > > I'm waiting for the test result from syzbot and will post. Let's see if you > are OK with that. > > Thanks
Oh I didn't know one can push a test to syzbot and get back a result. How does one do that? > > > > >
