On Wed 24 Jul 04:16 PDT 2019, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 22/07/2019 18:58, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
>
> > DT nodes should be ordered by address, then node name, and finally label.
> > The msm8998 dtsi does not follow this, so clean it up by reordering the
> > nodes. While we are at it, extend the addresses to be fully 32-bits wide
> > so that ordering is easy to determine when adding new nodes. Also, two
> > or so nodes had the wrong address value in their node name (did not match
> > the reg property), so fix those up as well.
> >
> > Hopefully going forward, things can be maintained so that a cleanup like
> > this is not needed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.h...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 254 +++++++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
>
> LGTM.
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonza...@free.fr>
>
> Rob, Mark: when there are multiple reg properties, why is the convention
> to use the *first* address in the node's name, rather than the lowest
> address?
>
Per the ePAPR (section 2.2.1 Node Names of v1.1):
"The unit-address must match the first address specified in the reg
property of the node".
Regards,
Bjorn
> e.g.
>
> spmi_bus: spmi@800f000 {
> compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
> reg = <0x0800f000 0x1000>,
> <0x08400000 0x1000000>,
> <0x09400000 0x1000000>,
> <0x0a400000 0x220000>,
> <0x0800a000 0x3000>;
> reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg";
>
> "spmi@800f000" instead of "spmi@800a000"
>
> Especially, since the reg props could be in any order here, given the
> lookup by name.
>
> Regards.
