On 2019/7/26 17:37, Joseph Qi wrote:
On 19/7/26 11:36, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
In ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry(), there is an if statement on line 2136 to
check whether loc->xl_entry is NULL:
if (loc->xl_entry)
When loc->xl_entry is NULL, it is used on line 2158:
ocfs2_xa_add_entry(loc, name_hash);
loc->xl_entry->xe_name_hash = cpu_to_le32(name_hash);
loc->xl_entry->xe_name_offset = cpu_to_le16(loc->xl_size);
and line 2164:
ocfs2_xa_add_namevalue(loc, xi);
loc->xl_entry->xe_value_size = cpu_to_le64(xi->xi_value_len);
loc->xl_entry->xe_name_len = xi->xi_name_len;
Thus, possible null-pointer dereferences may occur.
To fix these bugs, if loc-xl_entry is NULL, ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry()
abnormally returns with -EINVAL.
These bugs are found by a static analysis tool STCheck written by us.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1...@gmail.com>
---
fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
index 385f3aaa2448..f690502daf3c 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/xattr.c
@@ -2154,8 +2154,10 @@ static int ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry(struct ocfs2_xa_loc
*loc,
}
}
ocfs2_xa_wipe_namevalue(loc);
- } else
- ocfs2_xa_add_entry(loc, name_hash);
+ } else {
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
Since entry not found, so there is nothing to do in
ocfs2_xa_prepare_entry(). We may change it like:
if (!loc->xl_entry) {
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
if (ocfs2_xa_can_reuse_entry(loc, xi)) {
......
}
.....
Okay, I will send a v2 patch.
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai