Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 19:09, Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@kernel.org> a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:50 PM Jerome Brunet <jbru...@baylibre.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 22 Jul 2019 at 11:54, Alexandre Mergnat <amerg...@baylibre.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > @@ -1592,13 +1737,29 @@ static struct clk_regmap gxbb_vid_pll_div = {
> > > .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data) {
> > > .name = "vid_pll_div",
> > > .ops = &meson_vid_pll_div_ro_ops,
> > > - .parent_names = (const char *[]){ "hdmi_pll" },
> > > + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * This clock is declared here for GXL and GXBB
> > > SoC, so
> > > + * we must use string name to set this parent to
> > > avoid
> > > + * pointer issue.
> > > + */
> >
> > I don't really get the issue with this comment.
> >
> > How about:
> >
> > /*
> > * Note:
> > * gxl and gxbb have different hdmi_plls (with different struct clk_hw).
> > * We fallback to the global naming string mechanism so vid_pll_div picks
> > * up the appropriate one.
> > */
>
> If you're sticking to global names for now, you could just skip converting
> this clock altogether. I suspect .parent_names will be around for some time.
I prefer to perform a complete migration because it is possible that
.parent_names
becomes deprecated one day. I think it's cleaner to do it one shot and
avoid keeping
redundant structure with the new one.
>
> On the other hand, if you really want to get rid of global clock name based
> parenting, you could use clk_hw pointers, and have the probe function fix
> up this one based on the compatible string. That's what I did.
Sounds good, may I have the commit or file which is implement this please?
I wonder if it worth to add complexity in probe instead of using a dedicated
field in .parent_data for string name. I guess that depend on the complexity
done in probe.
>
> Just my two cents.
>
> ChenYu
>
> > > + .name = "hdmi_pll",
> > > + .index = -1,
> > > + },
> > > .num_parents = 1,
> > > .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,
> > > },
> > > };
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
