On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 15:53 +0100, James Morse wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On 12/07/2019 04:48, Chris Packham wrote: > > > > I still seem to be struggling to get this on anyone's radar. > Whose radar does it need to cross? >
That's a good question. The last solid guidance I had was that this series was going in via the ARM tree. But as you say below that was two years ago. I only realised recently that the ARM core seems to have a different workflow to other kernel subsystems. > > > > > The Reviews/Acks have been given so this should be good to go in > > via the ARM > > tree as planned. > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2017-August/5 > > 25561.html > For your v8 I took this to mean this series was done! > > If nothing has changed with Boris and Russell's decision (it was two > years ago....), > details of the patch system are here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190624142346.pxljv3m4npatd > i...@shell.armlinux.org.uk/ > Thanks for the link. I would have never found that. I did try to follow what I could find on https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/ but a lot of that seems to be out of date. I did manage to submit v9 to the ARM patch tracker but naturally I messed it up the first time https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patch es/viewpatch.php?id=8877/1 and I'm not sure I got the second attempt right either https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.ph p?id=8885/1 > Thanks, > > James
