On 7/26/19 2:30 PM, luca abeni wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 09:27:52 +0100 > Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] >> @@ -2121,17 +2121,13 @@ static int push_dl_task(struct rq *rq) >> } >> >> deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0); >> - sub_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl); >> - sub_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &rq->dl); >> set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu); >> - add_rq_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl); >> >> /* >> * Update the later_rq clock here, because the clock is used >> * by the cpufreq_update_util() inside __add_running_bw(). >> */ >> update_rq_clock(later_rq); >> - add_running_bw(&next_task->dl, &later_rq->dl); > > Looking at the code again and thinking a little bit more about this > issue, I suspect a similar change is needed in pull_dl_task() too, no?
The code looks the same. Let me try to test it. I will add it in v2 then.
