On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 08:55:21PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult 
wrote:
> From: Enrico Weigelt <i...@metux.net>
> 
> IS_ERR() already calls unlikely(), so this extra unlikely() call
> around IS_ERR() is not needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Enrico Weigelt <i...@metux.net>

Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com>

> ---
>  net/sctp/socket.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
> index aa80cda..9d1f83b 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/socket.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
> @@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ static int sctp_setsockopt_bindx(struct sock *sk,
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       kaddrs = memdup_user(addrs, addrs_size);
> -     if (unlikely(IS_ERR(kaddrs)))
> +     if (IS_ERR(kaddrs))
>               return PTR_ERR(kaddrs);
>  
>       /* Walk through the addrs buffer and count the number of addresses. */
> @@ -1315,7 +1315,7 @@ static int __sctp_setsockopt_connectx(struct sock *sk,
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       kaddrs = memdup_user(addrs, addrs_size);
> -     if (unlikely(IS_ERR(kaddrs)))
> +     if (IS_ERR(kaddrs))
>               return PTR_ERR(kaddrs);
>  
>       /* Allow security module to validate connectx addresses. */
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Reply via email to