On 29-07-19, 17:49, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> This patch fixes the following warning (Building: arm):
> 
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c: In function ‘dra7_efuse_xlate’:
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:79:20: warning: this statement may fall through 
> [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>    calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c:80:2: note: here
>   case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP:
>   ^~~~
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index 2ad1ae17932d..aeaa883a8c9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static unsigned long dra7_efuse_xlate(struct 
> ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data,
>       case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_ALL_MPU_OPP:
>       case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_HIGH_MPU_OPP:
>               calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_HIGH_MPU_OPP;
> +             /* Fall through */
>       case DRA7_EFUSE_HAS_OD_MPU_OPP:
>               calculated_efuse |= DRA7_EFUSE_OD_MPU_OPP;
>       }

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh

Reply via email to