Am Di., 30. Juli 2019 um 16:09 Uhr schrieb Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>: [...] > Sorry, but this is not going to be accepted. There is an ongoing > discussion about PHY LEDs and how they should be configured. Switch > LEDs are no different from PHY LEDs. So they should use the same basic > concept. > > Please take a look at the discussion around: > > [RFC] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration > > Marvell designers have made this more difficult than it should be by > moving the registers out of the PHY address space and into the switch > address space. So we are going to have to implement this code twice > :-( Ok, good to know. I'll wait for the first implementation and take it as a reference.
Hubert
